Re: RFC 4666 M3UA - Reg Request Message

Lincoln,

The deficiency addressed by LOADSEL, as described in the Overview
section 1.4., is that existing approaches are not amenable in the
following situations:

  a) Connection- or Transaction-Oriented traffic flows which group
     the message corresponding to a connection or transaction.

  b) Large scale ssytems that need to adapt to dynamic traffic
     loading.

  c) Systems that need dynamic reconfiguration under ASP control
     for maintenance or fail-over purposes.

  d) Systems that require ASP control over load-sharing (such as
     those that attempt to minimize state sharing while maximizing
     reliability).

But that is contained in the overview of the draft...

--brian

Haresign Lincoln wrote:                 (Tue, 07 Nov 2006 13:41:13)
> Ilie,
> 
> Personally, I don't see how CICs can work in the old M3UA draft.
> 
> And I'm still trying to determine what the actual requirements are.  
> 
> Do AS share the same PC as the SG when working with CICs or do we
> require a different PC?
> 
> I think the first issue is to define all the requirements.
> 
> Regards,
> Lincoln 
> 

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/