Re: RFC 4666 M3UA - Reg Request Message
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ilie, I think that you will find from my previous note that forcing an RK approach on something that is fundamentally a load sharing algorithm has inherent disadvantages that make it unworkable in any system of significant scale (10,000 - 50,000 trunks). --brian Ilie Glib wrote: (Tue, 07 Nov 2006 20:46:05) > Lincoln, Brian > > as far as I can understand, the old draft has everything that is > needed to solve CIC problem in a distributed application, that is, an > RK can contain CIC ranges. NTFY procedures will distribute AS/ASP > status changes to ASPs of the AS. > > In order to receive a NTFY an ASP has to be inactive for the RK. > > The rest is implementation dependent, handling of application level > procedures is the task of the concerned distributed AS. > > /Ilie > -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/