Re: RFC 4666 M3UA - Reg Request Message

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ilie,

I think that you will find from my previous note that forcing an RK approach
on something that is fundamentally a load sharing algorithm has inherent
disadvantages that make it unworkable in any system of significant scale
(10,000 - 50,000 trunks).

--brian

Ilie Glib wrote:                            (Tue, 07 Nov 2006 20:46:05)
> Lincoln, Brian
> 
> as far as I can understand, the old draft has everything that is
> needed to solve CIC problem in a distributed application, that is, an
> RK can contain CIC ranges. NTFY procedures will distribute AS/ASP
> status changes to ASPs of the AS.
> 
> In order to receive a NTFY an ASP has to be inactive for the RK.
> 
> The rest is implementation dependent, handling of application level
> procedures is the task of the concerned distributed AS.
> 
> /Ilie
> 

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.