Re: CIC as a RK

Brian,

see below.

Regards

/Ilie

On 11/9/06, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ilie,
>
> I do not think that interoperability between single-vendor processes
> within the MGC complex is an issue.

ilie: I agree. I was talking about SG and ASPs

>Distributing CIC is not something
> that an SG need do, as SS7 cannot do it and the aim of M3UA is simply
> to tranparently transport MTP-User messages with some degree of
> reliabilty (approaching that afforded by the SS7 network).

ilie: I agree.
>
> --brian
>
>
> Ilie Glib wrote:                            (Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:17:46)
> > Brian,
> >
> > still interoperability between SG and ASPs is an issue here, otherwise
> > there is no reason to do anything related to CICs.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > /Ilie
> >
> > On 11/9/06, Ilie Glib <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Brian,
> > >
> > > I do agree with your statement below.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > /Ilie
> > >
> > > On 11/9/06, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Lyndon,
> > > >
> > > > I believe that at least Jitin an I agree that distribution of messages
> > > > on CIC range is a matter to be dealt with within the MGC complex and
> > > > not by the SG (not even SS7 is capable of distributing CIC ranges
> > > > across signalling points).  As the MGC is largely a single vendor
> > > > environment, I do not believe that interoperability is at issue and
> > > > the matter should not be dealt with by the main RFC.
> > > >
> > > > --brian
> > > >
> > > > Lyndon Ong wrote:                        (Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:20:11)
> > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've been watching the discussion with interest, but am not sure if
> > > > > a consensus is developing (a problem with this group for a while).
> > > > > Can people state what they think is the best approach?
> > > > >
> > > > > e.g, work within the current (updated) M3UA, define some extension
> > > > > to the M3UA, work on Brian's LOADSEL proposal?
> > > > >
> > > > > Lyndon
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Brian F. G. Bidulock
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://www.openss7.org/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ilie
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ilie
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>


-- 
Ilie