RE: Lift M3UA improvements into SUA

"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <849535E338E99741B7F7413F73253EDB0523B8D8@us-nj-mail1.comverse.com>
Brian,

Funny thing is that they are using point codes.  That's why I said they
could easily use M3UA.  They are using PC as the RK but are convinced
that they must use SUA.  Can't convince them otherwise.

Regards,
Lincoln 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 5:40 PM
To: Haresign Lincoln
Cc: Ilie Glib; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Lift M3UA improvements into SUA

Lincoln,

They probably do not want to assign a point code every time they hook up
an application.

--brian

Haresign Lincoln wrote:                       (Thu, 09 Nov 2006
16:45:02)
> Ilie,
> 
> In limited cases, we are seeing customer demanding SUA as the 
> interface to their switches.  So there is industry interest in SUA.  
> In the one case where we are actively involved, M3UA would clearly 
> work in place of SUA and it is not clear to us why the network 
> customer demands SUA, but there you have it.  Sometimes the customer 
> is always right (or you loose the contract).
> 
> Regards,
> Lincoln
> 

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.