RE: Lift M3UA improvements into SUA
"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <849535E338E99741B7F7413F73253EDB0523B8D8@us-nj-mail1.comverse.com> |
Brian, Funny thing is that they are using point codes. That's why I said they could easily use M3UA. They are using PC as the RK but are convinced that they must use SUA. Can't convince them otherwise. Regards, Lincoln -----Original Message----- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 5:40 PM To: Haresign Lincoln Cc: Ilie Glib; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Lift M3UA improvements into SUA Lincoln, They probably do not want to assign a point code every time they hook up an application. --brian Haresign Lincoln wrote: (Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:45:02) > Ilie, > > In limited cases, we are seeing customer demanding SUA as the > interface to their switches. So there is industry interest in SUA. > In the one case where we are actively involved, M3UA would clearly > work in place of SUA and it is not clear to us why the network > customer demands SUA, but there you have it. Sometimes the customer > is always right (or you loose the contract). > > Regards, > Lincoln > -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/