Re: V5UA: Query reg Text formatted interface identifier

"Saurabh Jain" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all,
Does anyone have update on the prev question of Text formatted interface
identifier (is there any benefit of using Text based ?

Also i have another query on V5UA,
   Is EFA field required in following messages:

   -         TEI Status Request
   -         TEI Status Confirm
   -         TEI Status Indication
   -         TEI Query Message (Request)?

rgds
Saurabh

On 11/9/06, Saurabh Jain <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
> It will have to be "000*3*00080000006F" not "000*1*00080000006F"?
> (because Text Identifer has Tag value 03)
>
> But then, next question is:
>
> In IUA there are 3 types of Interface Identifiers are applicable:
>     Integer based Interface Identifier
>      Integer Range based Interface Identifier
>      Text formatted Interface Identifier
>
> In V5UA RFC 2 types of Interface Identifiers are applicable
>     Integer based Interface Identifier
>      Text formatted Interface Identifier
>
> Now in V5UA, if there is no difference between Integer Based and Text
> Formatted Interface Identifer, apart from there Tag values (0x01 & 0x03
> resp), then why was Text formatted Interface Identifier introduced in V5UA
> at all?
>
>
> rgds
> Saurabh
>
>
>
>
> On 11/9/06, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected] > wrote:
> >
> > Saurabh,
> >
> > Just a wild guess... but what about "000100080000006F"?
> >
> > --brian
> >
> > Saurabh Jain wrote:                                                (Thu,
> > 09 Nov 2006 16:36:48)
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a query regarding Text formatted interface identifier.
> > > In RFC 3807: V5UA ,    Section 4.2.  V5 Naming Conventions for
> > > Interface Identifier   states :
> > >
> > >    If used, the text formatted interface identifier SHALL be coded as
> > >    the hex representation of the integer formatted interface
> > identifier,
> > >    written as a variable length string.
> > >
> > >
> > > Format for Integar Based Interface Identifier
> > >     0                   1                   2                   3
> > >   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
> > >    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> > >    |           Tag (0x1)           |             Length            |
> > >    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> > >    |        Link Identifier                              | Chnl ID |
> > >    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> > >
> > > Format for Text Based Interface Identifier
> > >     0                   1                   2                   3
> > >   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
> > >    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> > >    |           Tag (0x3)           |             Length            |
> > >    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> > >    /                   Interface Identifier (text)                 \
> > >    \                   (Link Identifier + Chnl ID)                 /
> > >    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> > >
> > >
> > > Example:      Link Identifier = 3
> > >               Chnl ID = 15
> > >
> > > Integer-based Interface Identifier would be coded as
> > >       Binary: (0000000000000001 0000000000001000)
> > >               (000000000000000000000000011 01111)
> > >       Hex:    00 01 00 08
> > >               00 00 00 6F
> > >
> > > Question is : What would be the corresponding encoding for Text-based
> > > Interface Identifier?
> > >
> > > rgds
> > > Saurabh
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sigtran mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> >
> > --
> > Brian F. G. Bidulock
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.openss7.org/
> >
>
>

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.