Re: CIC as a RK

Jitin,

As as start, could you review the current LOADSEL and LOADGRP drafts
and identify any requirement that you feel these drafts do not already
address?

--brian

Bhandari, Jitin (Jitin) wrote:           (Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:15:44)
> Lincoln,
> 
> We all understand the WG last decision (of excluding CIC in RK) and the
> rational behind it but given the complexity of MGCs and given that Sigtran
> and M3UA is defined for SG & MGC in distributed setups (at-least one of the
> prime models), It would be great if we can enhance the scope and
> requirements for M3UA and have such methods of routing at SG for MGC.
> 
> I understand that M3UA respects integrity of Routing Label at MTP3 and does
> not scope RKs beyond it but in SIGTRAN context and distributed nature of a
> MGC, we can always enhance(or consider) M3UA's role in that context.
> 
> Again, in my last email I just clarified the two rational and did conclude
> that I would appreciate if we can reach to some conclusions (i.e.
> requirements, issues, and solutions) related to such enhancements. 
> 
> Thanks,
> -Jitin

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/