RE: M3UA : query on RC presence in messages
"Prabind Chaubey" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <22F058C3ED9D784E90CE473F2A9847F0ADB18B@in-exchange> |
Brian, If it is known by configuration that which AS the asp is going to serve into, is it mandatory to send RC from asp, even if the multiple AS are being served by the asp? I mean SG can very well route the message to MTP3 based on the DPC in the message. Regards, Prabind -----Original Message----- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 4:26 PM To: Lev Finkel Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [SIGTRAN] M3UA : query on RC presence in messages Lev, Section 3.8.1 Error/RFC 4666 ... The "No Configured AS for ASP" error is sent if a message is received from a peer without a Routing Context parameter and it is not known by configuration data which Application Servers are referenced. --brian Lev Finkel wrote: (Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:00:45) > > Hi, > > > > is the statement in RFC 3332/4466 sections 3.3.1 (and same for other > messages) > > "Where multiple Routing Keys and Routing Contexts are used across a > common association, the Routing Context MUST be sent to identify the > traffic flow, assisting in the internal distribution of Data messages" > > relates to both ASP and SGP? > > Is it correct for SGP to reply with ERROR upon DATA message without RC > after several RC coordinated? Is it mandatory to send ERROR? Or M3UA > implementation may allow to forward message based on DPC only? > > > > Regards, > > Lev Finkel > > Veraz Networks ltd. > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/ _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran