Re: M3UA IPSP
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Claudia, Claudia Lin wrote: (Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:20:49) > > I would like to ask questions about M3UA IPSP(RFC 4666) > > > 1. I've read one thread saying SSNM(except SCON) is not supported for > IPSP mode. What if we received > > SSNM (the peer node does not apply to this rule), should we > handle it as ASP, or should we discard it > > and send an Error with unexpected message? Unexpected message. > > > 2. For IPSP single exchange, only one Routing Context is defined > for both IPSPs. Doesn't that mean both IPSPs > > are the same AS? If so then do they have the same Point > Code? I am not able to make sense of this. They have symmetric routing keys. One end's local point code is the other end's remote point code. The RC defines a set of connected AS. --brian > > > > Thanks for your input, > > Claudia > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/