Re: M3UA IPSP

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Claudia,

Claudia Lin wrote:                                                                 (Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:20:49)
> 
>    I would like to ask questions about M3UA IPSP(RFC 4666)
> 
> 
>    1.  I've read one thread saying SSNM(except SCON) is not supported for
>    IPSP mode. What if we received
> 
>               SSNM (the peer node does not apply to this rule), should we
>    handle it as ASP, or should we discard it
> 
>              and send an Error with unexpected message?

Unexpected message.

> 
> 
>          2. For IPSP single exchange, only one Routing Context is defined
>    for both IPSPs. Doesn't that mean both IPSPs
> 
>               are  the  same  AS?  If so then do they have the same Point
>    Code? I am not able to make sense of this.

They have symmetric routing keys.  One end's local point code is the other
end's remote point code.  The RC defines a set of connected AS.

--brian

> 
> 
> 
>    Thanks for your input,
> 
>    Claudia

> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran


-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.