Re: SCTP - Mobile Ipv6
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran,gmane.ietf.mip6 |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Guillaume, Guillaume FORTAINE wrote: (Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:52:15) > Misters, > > Happy New Year to you. > > Would not it be SCTP the best Transport protocol for NGNs ? > > http://www.tml.tkk.fi/Studies/T-110.551/2004/papers/Ratola.pdf > This paper is how many years old? The first internet draft on the subject (draft-riegel-tuexen-mobile-sctp-00.txt) submitted Feb 25 2002 had an Cisco IPR disclosure submitted three days earlier. (See http://www.ietf.org/ipr for the above draft). > > Maybe we should merge the best of SCTP and Mobile Ipv6 under a common name ? > > Which starting point could be the best : msctp or cstp ? Been there done that: draft-riegel-tuexen-mobile-sctp-07.txt draft-sjkoh-msctp-01.txt draft-sjkoh-mobile-sctp-mobileip-05.txt Also, these proposals are not part of the mandate for the SIGTRAN WG. (Please drop [email protected] from Cc list). More likely tsvwg or mobileip... Perhaps Dr. Tuexen, co-author of the first draft, can comment further. --brian > > I look forward to your answer, [plonk] > > Best Regards, > > Guillaume > > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/