M2UA, M3UA: Notify and Dynamic Registration
"Grasic Valerij ITPSA9" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
I have questions about sending Notify message in case
of dynamic registration for both protocols M3UA and M2UA when
there is moving into AS-INACTIVE state. For both protocols it is
said that Notify message must be send after change in AS state.
For protocol M3UA there is flow chart regarding dynamic registration:
SGP ASP1
| |
|<------------ASP Up------------|
|----------ASP Up Ack---------->|
| |
|<----REGISTER REQ(LRCn,RKn)----| LRC: Local Routing
| | Key Id
|----REGISTER RESP(LRCn,RCn)--->| RK: Routing Key
| | RC: Routing Context
|----NTFY(AS-INACTIVE)(RCn)---->|
| |
| |
|<------- ASP Active(RCn)-------|
|-----ASP Active Ack (RCn)----->|
| |
|-----NTFY(AS-ACTIVE)(RCn)----->|
| |
For M2UA there is a flow chart:
SGP ASP1
|
|<---------ASP Up----------|
|--------ASP Up Ack------->|
| |
|<--------REG REQ----------|
|------REG REQ RESP------->|
| |
|<-------ASP Active--------|
|------ASP Active Ack----->|
| |
|------NTFY(AS-ACTIVE)---->|
Which of following is correct (sending Notify with move into AS-ACTIVE
state):
1. SGP must send Notify after ASP Up and before REG Req (following text
description - Notify after ASP Up).
2. SGP must send Notify after ASP Up and before REG Req,
plus can send another Notify after REG REQ Resp
3. SGP can send Notify after REG Resp (following flow chart description
plus Notify after ASP Up)
If statement 3.) is true, this can makes problem if another equipment is
working as statement 1.)?
Or there is even differrence between M3UA and M2UA on this issue?
Any suggestion wellcomed!
Regards,
Valerij