Re: Working of IPSP Clients in Override Mode !

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Mahantesh,

Mahantesh wrote:                                                 (Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:18:02)
> 
>    Hi there,
>    I am using ONE IPSP server and TWO IPSP clients configured in OVERRIDE
>    mode.
>    When I brought-up server and client-1 both comes up as an ACTIVE node.
>    After bring-up client-2, client-1 goes to INACTIVE state.
>    Now,
>    If  I  kill  client-2,  Client-1 should come up as ACTIVE. In my case,
>    Client-1 is still INACTIVE.
>    Is  it so that, always ASP-ACTIVE message needs to be sent to bring-up
>    the client-1, even in case of other ASP-failure.
>    From  server  NTFY  message with "ASP Failure" is sent to Client-1 [RC
>    value is wrong in NTFY message].

It appears that the problem is that the RC value is wrong in the NTFY message.
I assume that if client-1 receive an ASP Failure message with the correct RC
value, it would follow with an ASP-ACTIVE message.

Nevertheless, it is up to the IPSPs to coordinate amoung themselves.  When
IPSP-2 fails, IPSP-1 should detect this also through IPSP-IPSP communication.
The implementation might be relying, however, upon the application to perform
this IPSP-IPSP communication.

Step 1 would be correcting the problem with the RC value in the NTFY message.

--brian

>    Is this behaviour acceptable? [No, I guess]
>    Is it configuration dependent?
>    Rgds,
>    Mahantesh
>    IntelliNet Technologies
>    [1][email protected]
>    Call: 9945363151, 9980941127
> 
> References
> 
>    1. mailto:[email protected]

> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran


-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.