Re: Changeover M3UA-M2PA
pavel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian,
thanks for your answer.
i.e. if one ss7 SEP communicate with ASP and association to ASP is
broken, then SG1 must send the TFP-Message
to SEP, when no alternative ways on SG1 to ASP more exists. As response
activate the SEP rerouting to ASP over
SG2 (Forced rerouting).
But the SG1 have an alternate route to ASP (e.g. over SG2), the
following trafic must be transporeted on this route.
Please correct me.
+-------+
| ASP |
+-------+
| |
M3UA
_________| |_________
| |
| |
| |
+-------+ +--------+
| SG1 |----------------| SG2 |
+-------+ M2PA +--------+
| /
| /
| _________________/
| /
|/
+-------+
|SS7 SEP|
+-------+
Regards,
pavel
Brian F. G. Bidulock schrieb:
> pavel,
>
> Actions taken with regard to the association, both at the ASP and the
> SG, equivalent to the sequenced changeover procedure of Q.704/Clause 5
> are described in Section 1.5.1.2 (SPP Diverting peer SPP Traffic) of this
> draft:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bidulock-sigtran-corid-05.txt
>
> With regard to the interaction between STPs, the normal forced rerouting
> actions are taken per the likes of Q.704/Clause 7 (Forced rerouting).
>
> --brian
>
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, pavel wrote:
>
>
>> I have the following scenario. Connection between STP-ASP is M3UA and
>> between STP-STP M2PA.
>> My question is which primitives must be exchanged in the case of the
>> Changeover-Procedure, when
>> one connection between STP-ASP is failed, to retransmit the messages
>> over another STP.
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>> +-------+
>> | ASP |
>> +-------+
>> | |
>> M3UA
>> _________| |_________
>> | |
>> | |
>> | |
>> +-------+ +--------+
>> |SG/STP|------------------|SG/STP |
>> +-------+ M2PA +--------+
>> | |
>> | |
>> | |
>> SS7 SS7
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sigtran mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>>
>
>