RE: ASP vs IPSP

"Tolga Asveren" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Philippe,

I don't know whether it would make sense but I guess it is a possibility.
The only change I would suggest in your diagram would be an interworking
application on top of SEP and IPSP to bridge the two sides. Basically, this
would be "proxying" SS7 nodes in IP domain and vice versa. One could think
that in the first diagram the interworking happens on signalling layer
whereas for the second one it is more on application layer.

    Thanks,
    Tolga

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philippe Huvet I (MA/ESF) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 12:05 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Sigtran] ASP vs IPSP
>
>
> Hello Sigtran forum,
>
> In RFC3332, it exists the following diagram:
>
> ******************************************************************
> 1.5.3 Example 3: SGP Resident SCCP Layer, with Remote ASP
>
>       ********   SS7   *****************   IP   ********
>       * SEP  *---------*               *--------*      *
>       *  or  *         *      SGP      *        * ASP  *
>       * STP  *         *               *        *      *
>       ********         *****************        ********
>
>       +------+         +---------------+        +------+
>       | SCCP-|         |     SCCP      |        | SCCP-|
>       | User |         +---------------+        | User |
>       +------+           |   _____   |          +------+
>       | SCCP |           |  |     |  |          | SCCP |
>       +------+         +------+-+------+        +------+
>       | MTP3 |         | MTP3 | | M3UA |        | M3UA |
>       +------|         +------+ +------+        +------+
>       | MTP2 |         | MTP2 | | SCTP |        | SCTP |
>       +------+         +------+ +------+        +------+
>       |  L1  |         |  L1  | |  IP  |        |  IP  |
>       +------+         +------+ +------+        +------+
>           |_______________|         |______________|
>
> *******************************************************************
>
> Does it make any sense to put it this way ?
>
>
>       ********   SS7   *****************   IP   ********
>       * SEP  *---------*        *      *--------*      *
>       *  or  *         *   SEP  * IPSP *        * IPSP *
>       * STP  *         *        *      *        *      *
>       ********         *****************        ********
>
>       +------+         +---------------+        +------+
>       | SCCP-|         |     SCCP      |        | SCCP-|
>       | User |         +---------------+        | User |
>       +------+           |   _____   |          +------+
>       | SCCP |           |  |     |  |          | SCCP |
>       +------+         +------+-+------+        +------+
>       | MTP3 |         | MTP3 | | M3UA |        | M3UA |
>       +------|         +------+ +------+        +------+
>       | MTP2 |         | MTP2 | | SCTP |        | SCTP |
>       +------+         +------+ +------+        +------+
>       |  L1  |         |  L1  | |  IP  |        |  IP  |
>       +------+         +------+ +------+        +------+
>           |_______________|         |______________|
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.