Re: correct Error code
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ankit, Ankit Kumar Sharma wrote: (Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:33:50) > Also, RFC 4666 says: > - If the RC parameter is included in the ASP Active message and the > corresponding RK has been previously defined (by either static > configuration or dynamic registration), the peer node MUST respond > with an ASP Active Ack message. If for any local reason (e.g., > management lockout) the SGP responds to an ASP Active message with > an Error message with reason "Refused Management Blocking". > > I think RFC is talking about the case in which ASP active contains a > VALID RC value which is configured for the AS, whom this ASP wants to > serve, at peer. The RC value is valid (there is a corresponding RK defined by static configuration). > > Error message with "Invalid routing context" ecode seems to be a > better option because it clearly shows the cause. But is forbidden by the RFC in this case. Besides it is incorrect because the RC is valid, (just not permitted). --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/