RE: DPC + OPC Routing

"Newman, Catherine J" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <A09345776B6C7A4985573569C0F30043155A771A@rrc-dte-exs01.dte.telcordia.com>
Brian,

ANSI SCCP does not support sending UPU for SCCP unavailability or
sending SSTs for SSN=1 (these procedures went in as a draft at one point
in the early 90's and then were deleted).  (Note, ITU SCCP does support
UPU for SCCP unavailability / SSTs/SSAs for SSN=1)

Instead, at an STP, a TFP/TFA regarding the alias PC should be sent (see
ANSI T1.111.4, Section 3.A and 3.B). There are no ANSI procedures, that
I am aware of, for handling SCCP unavailability at an end node. The
assumption was, I believe, that SCCP can't fail independently of MTP
with current end-node implementations. 

Cathy Newman

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 12:22 AM
To: anjali gurmukhani
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] DPC + OPC Routing

anjali,

Send UPU(Inaccessible).  If remote user is ISUP, it will start UPT
procedures.
If remove user is SCCP, it will start SST procedures.

--brian

anjali gurmukhani wrote:
(Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:55:05)
> 
> 
> 
>    Hello Brian and all...
> 
> 
> 
>    I  had one question related to a scenario incase of  DPC + OPC
routing
>    is used in M3UA. Please see the figure below.
> 
> 
> 
>    Consider   that   at  SG(STPB),  there  are  two  Application
servers
>    configured  handling the traffic for the same DPC but originating
from
>    different OPCs
> 
> 
> 
>    AS1 - Rk Type - DPC + OPC - DPC = 0-0-9, OPC = 2-8-221 - ASP1
>    AS2 - Rk Type - DPC + OPC - DPC = 0-0-9, OPC = 2-8-222 - ASP2
> 
>        MSC1(2-8-221)
>              /-----\          STPA        STPB        DPC=0-0-9
>            ||       ||       +---- -+        +----- +
>             |       |--------|       +------- |
>    +--------ASP1(catering traffic for AS1)
>              \-----/        +--+--+        +---+-+
>                                 |               |
>                                 |               |
>                                 |               |
>         MSC2(2-8-222)  |               |
>                 ||------+---------+
+-----------ASP2(catering
>    traffic for AS2)
>               |     |
>                \---/
> 
> 
> 
>    Both AS's have a single ASP catering to them.
> 
> 
> 
>    If   the   ASP  serving  AS1  goes  down,  how  would  (through
which
>    message) STPB  (SG)propagate this to its adjoining STP(STPA) and
hence
>    to  OPC(because  as  such DPC 0-0-9 is still available) , so that
MSC1
>    does not send any messages for ASP1?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    -Regards
> 
>    Anjali.
>      _________________________________________________________________
> 
>    [1]Never miss an email again!
>    Yahoo!  Toolbar  alerts  you the instant new Mail arrives.[2] Check
it
>    out.
> 
> References
> 
>    1.
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49938/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/
features/mail/
>    2.
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49937/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/
features/mail/

> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran


-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.