Re: SIGTRAN Plugtest Day 3
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Barry, What problem results from not resending ASP Active? --brian Barry Nagelberg wrote: (Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:16:21) > Greetings from Moscow! Here is the wrap-up report for Day 3 of the SIGTRAN > Plugtest. > > Protocols tested: > M2PA - 5 implementations > M3UA - 6 implementations > M2UA - 2 implementations > SUA - 2 implementations > > There was one issue raised at the Day 3 wrap-up: > > Some ASP implementations are not resending the ASP-Active msg, after not > receiving the ASP-Active-Ack from the SGP. This behaviour is of course > allowed by RFC 4666. The RFC states that: > > <snip> > "If the ASP does not receive a response to an ASP Active message > within T(ack), the ASP MAY restart T(ack) and resend ASP Active > messages until it receives an ASP Active Ack message." > <snip> > > However the consensus within the group is that such behaviour is not very > logical, and that it would be helpful if the "MAY" > in the text above would be replaced with "SHOULD". > > Barry Nagelberg > > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/