Re: SIGTRAN Plugtest Day 3

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Barry,

You misunderstood the question, I think.  Let me rephrase:

Why would it be necessary to resend ASP Active?  (The first one surely
arrived: SCTP being a reliable transport.)

--brian

Barry Nagelberg wrote:                                  (Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:06:44)
> Brian,
> 
> The problem is that there must be a person present at a terminal somewhere
> to push a button to resend the ASP-Active. I doubt that many carriers would
> be happy about this.
> 
> Barry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 11:59 AM
> To: Barry Nagelberg
> Cc: SIGTRAN Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Sigtran] SIGTRAN Plugtest Day 3
> 
> 
> Barry,
> 
> What problem results from not resending ASP Active?
> 
> --brian
> 
> Barry Nagelberg wrote:                    (Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:16:21)
> > Greetings from Moscow! Here is the wrap-up report for Day 3 of the SIGTRAN
> > Plugtest.
> >
> > Protocols tested:
> > M2PA - 5 implementations
> > M3UA - 6 implementations
> > M2UA - 2 implementations
> > SUA  - 2 implementations
> >
> > There was one issue raised at the Day 3 wrap-up:
> >
> > Some ASP implementations are not resending the ASP-Active msg, after not
> > receiving the ASP-Active-Ack from the SGP. This behaviour is of course
> > allowed by RFC 4666. The RFC states that:
> >
> > <snip>
> > "If the ASP does not receive a response to an ASP Active message
> > within T(ack), the ASP MAY restart T(ack) and resend ASP Active
> > messages until it receives an ASP Active Ack message."
> > <snip>
> >
> > However the consensus within the group is that such behaviour is not very
> > logical, and that it would be helpful if the "MAY"
> > in the text above would be replaced with "SHOULD".
> >
> > Barry Nagelberg
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sigtran mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> 
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.