Re: Error - Routing Key not Currently Provisioned
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
cinar.eren, What is dynamic is the assignment of an RC value to a Routing Key. With dynamic registration, the ASP only needs to know the Routing Key and not the RC value. The Routing Key is expressed in terms native to the MTP User, whereas, the RC value is just an index assigned by the SGP. Therefore, dynamic registration relieves the application (or ASP) from provisioning RC values (nothing to do with MTP3) at the ASP to correspdond to routing keys (expressed in MTP routing label parameters). It may have advantage in some implementations of the ASP, not in others. Note that ETSI UMTS/3GPP forbids dynamic registration. --brian [email protected] wrote: (Mon, 07 May 2007 11:58:10) > Hi experts, > > then can u summarize shortly what we should understand if an SGP > supports dynamic configuration? > what is done dynamically/automatically(as i understand)? > > thanks in advance. > BR.. > cinar > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Salil Agrawal [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 07 May 2007 11:44 > To: [email protected]; Abhishek Jain > Cc: sigtran > Subject: RE: [Sigtran] Error - Routing Key not Currently Provisioned > > Hi Abhishek, > > I agree with Brian, all the SS7 routes should be statically configured > at SS7 network and there is no way of dynamic learning in the SS7 > network and that is the reason why you need to explicitly provision all > routing keys. > > Thanks, > Salil > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 1:26 PM > To: Abhishek Jain > Cc: sigtran > Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Error - Routing Key not Currently Provisioned > > Abhishek, > > For SS7 MTP there is no discovery protocol for routes: all routes are > explicitly provisioned. On top of that, some might be provisioned for > use by an ASP and some might not. > > --brian > > Abhishek Jain wrote: (Mon, 07 May 2007 > 12:23:55) > > > > Hi, > > > > > > From the excerpt in RFC 4666 > > > > > > > > If an SGP determines that a received Routing Key does not > currently > > exist, and the SGP supports dynamic configuration but requires > that > > the Routing Key first be manually provisioned at the SGP, the > SGP > > returns a Registration Response message to the ASP, > containing a > > Registration Result "Error - Routing Key not Currently > Provisioned". > > > > > > > > Can anyone give clarification what is the rationale behind > keeping > > routing keys manually provisioned. Does this statement means that > all > > Routing Keys have to be statically configured on SGP and > any > > registration request for new routing key will be rejected, in > this > > scenario mentioned or is this statement applicable for > selected > > routing keys which always have to manually provisioned rather > than > > dynamically. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Abhishek > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sigtran mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/