Re: # of Signalling Processes
"Ilie Glib" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
should you say SUA mentions n+k in one sentence without going to details or referring to M3UA. /Ilie On 5/9/07, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ilie, > > Ilie Glib > wrote: (Wed, 09 May > 2007 14:28:10) > > > > Brian, > > > > thanks for your answer. n+k redundancy is defined for M3UA > only. > > Indeed it may shield the AS from traffic inflow, but according to > my > > knowledge n+k redundancy is optional. So the SGs may not support > that. > > Untrue. SUA defines n+k redundancy as well. > > --brian > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ > -- Ilie _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran