Re: # of Signalling Processes
"Ilie Glib" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian, It's my fault. I am sorry about it. I was after the minimal number of remote signalling processes per remote logical entity (AS or SG) that provides for interoperability according to SIGTRAN. I know of at least several SIGTRAN implementations that have rather strict limits in that respect. Thus, a clarification from the WG in an official doc like implementors guide or deployment guide will definetly help the community. Regards /Ilie On 5/9/07, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ilie, > > Ilie Glib > wrote: (Wed, 09 May > 2007 14:30:33) > > > > I have asked for the minimal number that > provides for > > interoperability. That is different than the minimal number. > > Well, no, you asked: > > > > Could you please share your view on the minimum number of > signalling > > > processes per logical entity (AS or SG) that the SIGTRAN > signalling > > > processes MUST support. > > which is something different. The minimum numbers that MUST be provided > are > one. > > --brian > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ > -- Ilie _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran