RE: SS7 UPU FROM ASP
"Barry Nagelberg" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Emmanuel, The ASP sends a SS7 UPU message via its MTP3 layer, as specified by the MTP3 specs. This happens when M3UA sends an implementation-dependent primitive to the MTP3 layer (not to the M3UA-user). Because this primitive is implementation-dependent, it is not covered by the M3UA RFC. Barry Nagelberg Adax, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: emmanuel mavrommatis [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 1:09 PM To: sigtran Subject: [Sigtran] SS7 UPU FROM ASP Hi Brian, In a previous discussion about User Part Unavailable at ASP in M3UA in the question: I want to know which message is sent by the ASP in case it detects the > user part unavailability? you have stated: Kuldeep,In the case that the RK is based on SI value, ASP Inactive is the correct message. In the case that RK is based on PC, user part flow control isthe responsibility of the ASP (i.e. it could send UPU (the SS7 message, notthe M3UA SNMM message) to the other end, or an equivalent user part message (e.g. Subsystem Prohibited).--brian Could you please specify how the ASP will be able to send a SS7 UPU message? In what format this will be and which primitive between M3UA user and M3UA will be used? Is this covered by the standard? Best Regards, Emmanuel