Re: SUA routing contexts
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Steve, Steve Hill wrote: (Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:47:36) > > In IPSP operation it is my understanding that the sending AS and receiving > AS do not both need to be assigned the same routing context number. For > example: > > AS (rc = 1) > | > ASP 10.0.0.1:14001 > * > * > * > ASP 10.0.0.2:14001 > / \ > AS (rc = 2) AS (rc = 3) > > In the above case, the AS at 10.0.0.1 can send messages to both the ASs at > 10.0.0.2, despite the routing context numbers being different. As such, > the routing context parameter in the CLDT message always identifies the > destination AS, not the source AS. The above is true only for IPSP DE mode, where the RC represents only a _single_ direction of traffic flow. For IPSP SE mode, there can only be one RC between a pair of (local and remote) AS, representing _both_ directions of traffic flow. > My question is regarding how the routing context parameter should be used > when sending to an SG. The parameter is listed as mandatory, but when > sending to an SG I am unclear on what value should be placed in the > parameter since there is no concept of a destination routing context? The ASP-SG mode is the same as the IPSP SE mode: there can only be one RC value between an AS and an SGP, again representing _both_ directions of traffic flow. This is really no different for SUA than it is for M3UA. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/