'abnormal BSN' handling in M2PA
"debasri Sarkar" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
I need some clarification regarding 'abnormal BSN' handling in M2PA.
According to ITU-T specification Q.703, if two out of three received message
have wrong BSN, the message signal unit or fill in signal unit should be
discarded. Also level 3 is informed that the link is faulty (section 5.3.1).
Question 1:
-----------------
This is contradicting with the test case 3.8.10 specified in
draft-bidulock-sigtran-m2pa-test-08.
Test Description:
(1) The test begins with the link in the "In Service" state.
(2) Send a Data message to the IUT with an abnormal Backward
Sequence Number.
(3) Check that the IUT acknowledges the Data message delivers an
MSU to Level 3 at the IUT.
(4) Send a Data message to the IUT with an normal Backward Sequence
Number.
(5) Check that the IUT acknowledges the Data message delivers an
MSU to Level 3 at the IUT.
(6) Check that the IUT maintains the "In Service" state.
In step 3 M2PA should not deliver the data to level 3 and should not
acknowledge the data. It should silently discard it.
Question 2:
-----------------
In test case 3.8.11 of draft-bidulock-sigtran-m2pa-test-08, out of service
message
is send from IUT after a DATA_ACK message with normal BSN when two DATA_ACK
message is received with abnormal BSN previously.
___________________________________________________________________
|
|
| VAT:
PT IUT |
|
|
| DATA-ACK --FFFFFF,
7FFFFF-> |
| DATA-ACK --FFFFFF,
7FFFFF-> |
| DATA-ACK --FFFFFF,
FFFFFF-> |
|
<----------------- OUT-OF-SERVICE |
|
!out of service |
|
|
|___________________________________________________________________|
When two DATA_ACK has been received with wrong BSN value, why should we wait
for next DATA_ACK (with or without correct BSN value) to indicate the link
as a
fauly link?
Rather, OOS message can be trasmitted to peer along with proper link status
indication
to level 3 just after reception of 2 consecutive wrong BSN reception.
Please let me know if my understanding is correct.
Thanks for your time to read this query.
Regards,
Debasri
_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran