Re: The requiremnts and proposalsforM2PA/M3UA/SCTPExtension from China Mobile
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Zhang, That does not say why AS-SG-AS model (with SG as STP in the middle) cannot work for you. There is no need to extend the IPSP model do you what you need to simply reduce SCTP/M3UA information. So, make your STPs also SGs and have them serve point codes out to each MSC, HLR, SCP, SMSC, etc. as ASPs served by the SGs. Then the MSC, HLR, SCP, SCMS, etc. only need to known the STP SCTP/M3UA information, but can communicate with any SS7 signalling point via the SGs. The IPSP model does not need to be extended to do this. --brian Zhang Hao wrote: (Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:06:25) > Hi,Brian F. G. Bidulock£¡ > > In China Mobile's network, there are so many MSC Server and > HLR¡¢SCP¡¢SMSC¡£If all those IPSP are connected each other, each IPSP > should deploy all the other IPSP's SCTP/M3UA information. The > maintenance and management work is too heavy.If IPSTP is introduced into > the network and each IPSTP covers a number of IPSP,each IPSP need only > deploy the IPSTP's SCTP/M3UA information. IPSP sends correlative > messages to IPSTP, and it is the responsibility of IPSTP to relay those > message to another IPSP. So in the situation of deploying IPSTP in the > network, the M3UA routing management function should be entended. > Lookinf forward to your reply.' > > BRs > > China Mobile > Zhang Hao -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/