Re: m2ua: SG<->SG interoperation
"emmanuel mavrommatis" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Brian, In RFC 2719, 3.5 case 2, there is no MTP3 involved in the functionality of SG's. How can M2PA be used here? And why not M2UA? Thanks, Emmanuel On 8/7/07, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote: > > flash, > > No. Use M2PA (RFC 4165). > > --brian > > flash view wrote: (Mon, 06 Aug 2007 > 18:43:30) > > > > Hello, > > I've not > > found any information in RFC3331 that M2UA can be used in SG<->SG > sche > > me. But in RFC2719, 3.5. SG to SG Case 2 there is a figure > of > > SG<->SG scheme, where the endpoints are both SS7 SEPs. > > Can M2UA be SIG in RFC2719, 3.5. SG to SG Case 2? > > Andriy Melnyk. > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sigtran mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran