Re: m2ua: SG<->SG interoperation

"emmanuel mavrommatis" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Brian,

In RFC 2719, 3.5 case 2, there is no MTP3 involved in the functionality of
SG's. How can M2PA be used here? And why not M2UA?

Thanks,
Emmanuel

On 8/7/07, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> flash,
>
> No. Use M2PA (RFC 4165).
>
> --brian
>
> flash view wrote:                                 (Mon, 06 Aug 2007
> 18:43:30)
> >
> >    Hello,
> >    I've not
> >    found any information in RFC3331 that M2UA can be used in SG<->SG
> sche
> >    me. But   in   RFC2719, 3.5.   SG  to  SG Case  2 there is a figure
> of
> >    SG<->SG scheme, where the endpoints are both SS7 SEPs.
> >    Can M2UA be SIG in RFC2719, 3.5. SG to SG Case 2?
> >    Andriy Melnyk.
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sigtran mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.