Re: m2ua: SG<->SG interoperation

Brian,

Would it be possible to further clarify? In RFC 2719, 3.5 case 1, does SG2
imply an ASP? Shouldn't MTP3 be shown in case 2, in both SG's?

Thanks,
Emmanuel

On 8/7/07, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> emmanuel,
>
> Because M2PA is a peer-to-peer protocol as shown in
> the diagram, whereas M2UA is client-server (AS-SG).
>
> --brian
>
> emmanuel mavrommatis wrote:                  (Tue, 07 Aug 2007 13:22:50)
> >
> >    Hi Brian,
> >    In   RFC  2719,  3.5
>   case  2,  there  is  no  MTP3  involved  in  the
> >    functionality of SG's. How can M2PA be used here? And why not M2UA?
> >    Thanks,
> >    Emmanuel
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran