Re: Routing Context Confusion
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sheshendra, RFC 4666 all of Page 83. --brian Sheshendra Rathi wrote: (Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:49:48) > > Hi > > I have one confusion in a scenarion where > > 1. A Signalling Gatway configured with a routing context Recieves a ASP > ACTIVE message with NO RC(routing context), the SG should always respond ASP > Active ACK with RC or without RC. > > i.e ASP Active Recieved at SG WITHOUT RC > SG should respond with RC or not. > > It would be better you you can give me the section of RFC which says about > it. > I know that RC is optional, but have confusion whether it is optional even > within a > dialog (ASP ACTIVE -> ASP ACTIVE ACK ) > > Please Respond > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Routing-Context-Confusion-tf4492637.html#a12813040 > Sent from the IETF - Sigtran mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/