Re: Doubt in SE model
"Ankit Kumar Sharma" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Arif, On 10/17/07, Mohammad Arif <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > In Single exchange model of IPSPs. > If ASP_INACTIVE message is received from peer IPSP then state of local > IPSP should also be changed to INACTIVE.? > Because as per SE model ideology only one set of ASPTM messages will > change state on both IPSPs. > > Is my understanding correct? please clarify. > Yes, your understanding is correct if you have a single rc configured. Please check RFC 4666 section 4.3.4.4 for more details on this. > Thanks > > > -- > Regards > Mohammad Arif > Cheers, Ankit _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran