Re: M2PA: resynchronization of sequence numbers after PO

Devayya BOPAIAH <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:38:56 -0500

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Brian,

Just curious,

What happens suppose the second link status ready message sent by the 
peer is not recieved by the host, may be bacause of some network reasons 
? I think this part is missing in rfc 4165.

Thanks,
devayya


Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:

>Dario,
>
>Dario wrote:                                 (Thu, 15 Nov 2007 06:22:27)
>  
>
>-X--snip--X-
>  
>
>>Could you please explain why the second Link Status Ready (stream 1) is
>>needed?
>>thanks!
>>Kind regards, Dario
>>
>>    
>>
>
>To acknowledge the LSR sent from the other end and permit the peer to
>again send MSUs.
>
>--brian
>
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran