Re: M2PA: resynchronization of sequence numbers after P O

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Arne,

The RFC does not preclude you from using a local timer
for any local reason, so the point is moot.

--brian

Arne van Wilgen wrote:                                               (Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:29:47)
> 
>    Hello Brian,
> 
>    I  don't  agree.  SCTP may have many timers but there is just one type
>    (rfc 4960
>    6.3:  retransmission  timer T3-rtx) for data retransmission.  So for a
>    single
>    homed enpoint I expect there is just one timer for retransmission.
> 
>    The timer's duration depends on the IP network -- even if you specifiy
>    the
>    initial, max. and min. values for the timer.
> 
>    From  the  number  of  allowed retransmissions and the RTO.Max you can
>    derive the
>    maximum time it will take to detect COMMUNICATIONS LOST.
> 
>    So  either  you  change  SCTP's  parameters to achive a specific timer
>    behaviour with
>    the  impact  that  this  affects the entire association or you have to
>    introduce
>    another timer (as Xiangsong mentioned).
> 
>    Regards,
>    Arne
> 
>    --
>    Arne van Wilgen
>    NGN Protocols
>    Teles AG Communication Systems
>    Ernst-Reuter-Platz 8
>    D-10587 Berlin
>    GERMANY
> 

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.