Re: Draft "Sigtran Interworking in ISDN Access Gateways"

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran,gmane.ietf.megaco
Organization http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Javi,

Here is the last time it appeared on a megaco aggenda:

> 4. ISDN (draft-bouwen-megaco-isdn-??.txt)
> =========================================
> 
> Bart Van Doorselaar (XXXXXX) noted that the draft had been recycled to take
> out the discussion of signalling transport in Megaco.  Nevertheless, the
> issues of signalling channel management and D-channel data remained open.
> Brian Rosen encouraged Bart and his co-authors to submit detailed package
> proposals.  Scott Bradner asked whether the ITU-T might have related work in
> hand.  Christian Groves suggested that the group in Study Group 11 dealing
> with ISDN might be the right place to do the work.

And then it was no longer discussed.

As I recall, this was in the middle of development of IUA.  The
naming conventions were never adopted (MEGACO avoids such things)
and the rest of the document was too implementation oriented: that
is, it discussed which functions must be inside the box and how they
are to be arranged inside the box.  Also, as I recall, it was
considered undesirable to have MEGACO deal with signalling
particularly when, as in the ISDN D channel case, it is out of band.
That is, IUA instead of MEGACO should be controlling layer 1
termination of D-channels and MEGACO should only be concerned with
the B-channels.  But check through the list of ITU-T packages.

The only thing to come out of it from a SIGTRAN perspective was I
believe the provision of a text interface identifier in IUA.

--brian


Javi wrote:                                                           (Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:55:27)
> Hi Michael,
> 
> I did it, but I haven't found the reason neither if it has been ever 
> picked up again.
> 
> =========
> 
> Bart Van Doorselaer wrote:
> 
> Javi,
> 
> That draft is more than 7 years old, and as far as I can recall the work did
> not continue since there was a lack of interest at that time.
> 
> Meanwhile I have moved to another job so I did not really track whether this
> draft was ever picked up again.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> bvd
> 
> Bart Van Doorselaer
> Alcatel-Lucent 
> E-mail : [email protected]
> ===========
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Javi
> 
> 
> 
> Michael Tuexen escribió:
> > Hi Javi,
> >
> > have you asked the author of the ID?
> >
> > Best regards
> > Michael
> >
> > On Dec 14, 2007, at 11:31 AM, Javi wrote:
> >
> >> After reading much information about isdn access gateways, I have 
> >> noted the draft "draft-bouwen-megaco-isdn-01.txt"
> >> is commoly referenced. Also, its scope is considered very relevant 
> >> for interworking ISDN equipments in new NGN networks.
> >>
> >> Why did the work not continue to generate a RFC?.
> >>
> >> Javi
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sigtran mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> >>
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.