Re: Draft "Sigtran Interworking in ISDN Access Gateways"
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran,gmane.ietf.megaco |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Javi, Here is the last time it appeared on a megaco aggenda: > 4. ISDN (draft-bouwen-megaco-isdn-??.txt) > ========================================= > > Bart Van Doorselaar (XXXXXX) noted that the draft had been recycled to take > out the discussion of signalling transport in Megaco. Nevertheless, the > issues of signalling channel management and D-channel data remained open. > Brian Rosen encouraged Bart and his co-authors to submit detailed package > proposals. Scott Bradner asked whether the ITU-T might have related work in > hand. Christian Groves suggested that the group in Study Group 11 dealing > with ISDN might be the right place to do the work. And then it was no longer discussed. As I recall, this was in the middle of development of IUA. The naming conventions were never adopted (MEGACO avoids such things) and the rest of the document was too implementation oriented: that is, it discussed which functions must be inside the box and how they are to be arranged inside the box. Also, as I recall, it was considered undesirable to have MEGACO deal with signalling particularly when, as in the ISDN D channel case, it is out of band. That is, IUA instead of MEGACO should be controlling layer 1 termination of D-channels and MEGACO should only be concerned with the B-channels. But check through the list of ITU-T packages. The only thing to come out of it from a SIGTRAN perspective was I believe the provision of a text interface identifier in IUA. --brian Javi wrote: (Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:55:27) > Hi Michael, > > I did it, but I haven't found the reason neither if it has been ever > picked up again. > > ========= > > Bart Van Doorselaer wrote: > > Javi, > > That draft is more than 7 years old, and as far as I can recall the work did > not continue since there was a lack of interest at that time. > > Meanwhile I have moved to another job so I did not really track whether this > draft was ever picked up again. > > Kind regards, > > bvd > > Bart Van Doorselaer > Alcatel-Lucent > E-mail : [email protected] > =========== > > > Best regards, > > Javi > > > > Michael Tuexen escribió: > > Hi Javi, > > > > have you asked the author of the ID? > > > > Best regards > > Michael > > > > On Dec 14, 2007, at 11:31 AM, Javi wrote: > > > >> After reading much information about isdn access gateways, I have > >> noted the draft "draft-bouwen-megaco-isdn-01.txt" > >> is commoly referenced. Also, its scope is considered very relevant > >> for interworking ISDN equipments in new NGN networks. > >> > >> Why did the work not continue to generate a RFC?. > >> > >> Javi > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Sigtran mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/