Re: SUA IP+SSN based routing and load sharing.
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Haresign, Haresign Lincoln wrote: (Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:44:10) > > Perhaps the intention is to use SSN/IP in an ALL IP network (no SG, > therefore no loadshare mode). In this case, perhaps it makes sense. Yes, the purpose for IP+SSN was in an all-IP network (SUA nodes operating as relay nodes or IPSP nodes) and what it avoids would be arbitrarily assigning an SS7 point code to a node that never sees an SS7 network (what numbering authority would you get that from)? Perhaps hostname+SSN would have made more sense in an all-IP network, but there is no hostname+SSN, just hostname. Where it never made sense to me was using SUA at all in an all-IP network. Something more like ITU-T's TI-SCCP (Q.2220) using the Generic Signalling Transport Service (see Q.2150.0, Q.2150.1, Q.2150.2 and, for SCTP, Q.2150.3) makes more sense to me. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/