M2PA - couple of questions for RFC
Dario <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I have few questions for M2PA RFC, specifically: 1. (RFC4165, section 4.1.3) "The proving period MAY be omitted if this is allowed by the applicable MTP2 standard (e.g. Q.2140)" also section 4.1.4. "When M2PA experiences a local processor outage, it MAY put the link out of service.... if this is allowed by applicable MTP2 standard (e.g. Q.2140)" I do not understand these statements: M2PA link replaces MTP2 link. Should the M2PA link be MTP2 standard specific "coloured", for example "M2PA link replacing Q.2140" or "M2PA link replacing Q.703". I understood there is only one M2PA link, so I am a bit confused with the statements on "applicable MTP2 stadards". 2. (RFC 4165, section 4.2.1, last paragraph) "Because propagation delays in IP network are more variable than in traditional SS7 networks, a single T7 timer as in MTp2 is inadequate. If any message is unacknowledged after a period equal to the T7 value, the T7 timer SHALL expire." what is the meaning of this statement?? T7 may expire...should its value be extended, or what? 3. how should M2PA link react if it receives Link Status Processor Recovered message when the link is in IN-SERVICE state? thanks! Kind regards, Dario -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/M2PA---couple-of-questions-for-RFC-tp15612860p15612860.html Sent from the IETF - Sigtran mailing list archive at Nabble.com.