Re: NBAP over SCTP
"Ben Davis" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, Thanks for your reply. Please correct me if I mis-undertood your reply: 1) PPI is of no use for the upper protocol. 2) PPI is of no use for the upper protocol, whatever its value. 3) PPI value could, therefore, even be one of those already registered by IANA (worst case for the sniffer..). Does it make sense ?? 4) What is the procedure to register a new value by IANA ? Ben 2008/3/28, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]>: > > Ben, > > PPI is largely optional and mostly so that protocol sniffers > can determine the transported protocol without relying on > well-known port numbers. A protocol does not require a PPI > to operate. Nevertheless, applying for one from IANA is a > straightforward procedure. > > --brian > > Ben Davis wrote: (Fri, 28 Mar 2008 > 17:56:39) > > > > > Hello, > > 3GPP specified that NBAP protocol can be transported over SCTP. > > No payload protocol identifier is currently dedicated to NBAP. > > How does this work ? > > Thanks > > Ben > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sigtran mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > > > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ > _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran