M3UA/IPSP: can peer IPSPs use different Traffic Mode Type values ?
"Pascal Bouveron (Netbricks)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <0d1901c898cf$0aeee620$1500a8c0@pbn> |
Hello, In IPSP mode, should peer IPSPs use the same Traffic Mode Type, or can they use different modes ? For instance, one side being in OVERRIDE mode, while the other side would be in LOADSHARE mode ? My understanding is that this is not allowed. The only configuration where this could be "acceptable" to me would be when the LOADSHARE AS would be in 1+k redundancy model. Any other "n" value would not allow this config to work: only 1 Active IPSP can exist at the OVERRIDE side, while "n" (with n>1) are required for the LOADSHARE AS to move AS_Active. Correct ? However, would it work with n=1 at the LOADSHARE side, provided that the IPSP accepts an ASP_ACTIVE message with a Traffic Mode Type that is not the one that he woudl send in an outgoing ASP_ACTIVE itself ? I'm assuming we are in IPSP-SE mode here. In IPSP-DE mode, it would mean that both IPSPs would exchange ASP_ACTIVE messages with different TrafficMode Type values, and both would accept. If that is acceptable, then i suppose that the IPSPs in the LOADSHARE AS should handle a received NTFY[Alternate-ASP-Active] message as in the OVERRIDE case, i.e. consider themselves to be moved to ASP_INACTIVE state, just as if they would have received an ASP_INACTIVE, correct ? Thanks for any clarifications. Best regards Pascal Bouveron www.netbricks.com