M3UA/IPSP: can peer IPSPs use different Traffic Mode Type values ?

"Pascal Bouveron (Netbricks)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <0d1901c898cf$0aeee620$1500a8c0@pbn>
Hello,


In IPSP mode, should peer IPSPs use the same Traffic Mode Type, or can they use different modes ?
For instance, one side being in OVERRIDE mode, while the other side would be in LOADSHARE mode ?
My understanding is that this is not allowed.

The only configuration where this could be "acceptable" to me would be when the LOADSHARE AS would be in 1+k redundancy model.
Any other "n" value would not allow this config to work:
only 1 Active IPSP can exist at the OVERRIDE side, while "n" (with n>1) are required for the LOADSHARE AS to move AS_Active.
Correct ?

However, would it work with n=1 at the LOADSHARE side, provided that the IPSP accepts an ASP_ACTIVE message with a Traffic Mode Type 
that is not the one that he woudl send in an outgoing ASP_ACTIVE itself ?
I'm assuming we are in IPSP-SE mode here.
In IPSP-DE mode, it would mean that both IPSPs would exchange ASP_ACTIVE messages with different TrafficMode Type values, and both 
would accept.

If that is acceptable, then i suppose that the IPSPs in the LOADSHARE AS should handle a received NTFY[Alternate-ASP-Active] message 
as in the OVERRIDE case, i.e. consider themselves to be moved to ASP_INACTIVE state, just as if they would have received an 
ASP_INACTIVE, correct ?

Thanks for any clarifications.

Best regards
Pascal Bouveron
www.netbricks.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.