Re: RC with IPSP
"Ankit Kumar Sharma" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian, On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote: > Lukas, > > Please see comments inline... > > Lukas Alig wrote: (Wed, 02 Apr 2008 05:38:24) > > > > 1) Does anybody know if RC in IPSP is mandatory? According to > > RFC 4666 it is conditional, in some cases optional. > > For IPSP it is conditional also. > > > 2) As long as only one ASP will be served over a certain SCTP > > link, RC seems not to be mandatory. > > Yes, that would the "condition" in "conditional". > > > 3) If RC is mandatory, in which cases with IPSP would it be > > mandatory (messages). > > When more than one IPSP (ASP) is served over an SCTP association... I hope you meant, "When more than one AS is served over an SCTP association" > > > > 4) If one AS serves more than one IPSP peer, do we need to > > configure RCs? > > Because an AS is _served_ by more than one IPSP does not in itself > required the use of an RC as IPSPs serving the same AS normally have > different associations. > > It is when more than one AS is served by a given SCTP association, that > RC is required (to discrimintate to which AS messages belong). > > > 5) Is RC in IPSP of Ericsson HLR R12 supported or not? > > This is not the place to discuss vendor-specific implementations. > > --brian > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > Regards, Ankit _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran