Re: M3UA: ASP Route Availability to SG/STP
"Howard May" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Lincoln, I'm concerned about the availability of the Route to the STP not routes via the STP. If the STP has point code 'Alpha' then the ASP may have a route to point code 'Alpha'. It is the availability of this route at the ASP I am concerned with. It is clear that routes via the SG/STP will only become active after receiving DAVA. Best Regards > -----Original Message----- > From: Haresign Lincoln [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 03 September 2008 13:20 > To: Howard May; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Sigtran] M3UA: ASP Route Availability to SG/STP > > Howard, > > It would seem to me that if the SG responds to an ASP Active message, > that in effect tells the ASP that the SG is available to begin receiving > traffic. > > It's not clear to me. Are you concerned about the ability of the SG to > begin processing traffic. Or are you concerned about the > availability/status of all the point codes on the other side of the SG? > > > Regards, > Lincoln > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Howard May > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 6:01 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M3UA: ASP Route Availability to SG/STP > > Hi, > > I want to ask Sigtran list members / authors opinions about an area of > perceived ambiguity in the M3UA spec. > > Brian, at present the reasoning behind your expected ASP behaviour is > based on the MTP3 specs rather than the M3UA specs and an assertion that > M3UA should behave the same. The MTP3 specs clearly identify routes to > adjacent signalling points become available when the direct link set > comes into service at layer 3 (or after restart completes) and the Route > Set Test procedures are not used across the direct link set for the > adjacent signalling point. But the M3UA spec does not define similar > behaviour. M3UA does not seem to discuss any mechanism for route > availability other than reception of DAVA messages. > > While I recognise there may be ambiguity, I feel that at present the > specification suggests the adjacent signalling point at the SG/STP > should generate DAVA/DUNA messages and respond to DAUD messages and > should not be presumed to be available following AS Activation. > > I am concerned about this perceived ambiguity on account of the > interoperability impact and would value a clear consensus and > clarification as to the expected behaviour. > > Best Regards > > Howard > > ********** > > Concerning M3UA acting in the role of a restarting MTP. MTP Restart > procedures aim to allow sufficient bandwidth and route synchronisation > prior to the commencement of traffic. They also aim to reduce the time > for restart procedures to complete to allow traffic restart as quickly > as possible. They do this by prohibiting the transfer of traffic in > either direction prior to exchange of TRA messages and by presuming > route availability and exchanging only TFP messages. > > M3UA does not support such mechanisms and so will have to handle traffic > prior to having a fully synchronised routing table risking possible > message loss. > > ********** > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: 02 September 2008 17:03 > > To: Howard May > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M3UA: ASP Route Availability to SG/STP > > > > Howard, > > > > There are three scenarios: ASP/SG, multiple SG as STP and IPSP. > > I think that you are talking of the multiple SG as STP case. > > > > For the multiple SG as STP scenario, the ASP can be viewed as a > > separate SEP with its own signalling point code distinct from that of > > the STP point codes. The associations to the SG/STP can be viewed as > > a linkset. The STP signalling point codes can be viewed as adjacent > > STP. In the normal SS7 case where the SEP is connected by A-links, > > the STP signalling point codes are treated as available whenever a > > signalling link in the directly connecting link set is available at > > level 3, or whenever a routeset to the STP via the alternate STP is > > available. > > > > When the first association to an SG/STP pair becomes available to > > carry traffic (AS-ACTIVE), the ASP is acting in the role of a > > restarting MTP at an SEP. Instead of traffic restart messages, the > > M3UA at the ASP can use the DAUD procedure to effect MTP restart. > > When an association to an SG/STP becomes available and there is an > > existing association, or the ASP has sufficient recent knowledge of > > routing, the ASP is not a restarting MTP however the DAUD procedure > > may still be used to establish the availability of destinations via > > the SG/STP before starting or restarting traffic to the SG/STP. > > Nevertheless, the ASP may simply restart traffic to the SG/STP and > > handle whatever DUNA messages it receives as a result of restarting > > traffic instead of using the DAUD procedures. > > > > As regards the point code of the STP itself: the ASP is acting as a > > directly connected SEP (as though it was connecting using > > A-links) and therefore, as soon as a link in the linkset (in M3UA's > > case, an association) is available at level 3 directly connected to > > the STP, the STP's point code is available. In SS7, no TFA or TFP is > > sent to the SEP on a directly connected A-linkset for the STP's own > > point code, only for point codes available via the STP. > > > > So, yes, the ASP acting as an SEP in a multiple SG as STP case can > > assume that once it has an association to the SG/STP and is AS-ACTIVE > > for traffic via that SG/STP, it can assume that the SG/STP's point > > code is available. However, the point I was trying to make is that > > the ASP can simply assume that any point code is available via an > > association and route traffic to it, dealing, of course, with any DUNA > > > that it receives regarding the traffic it sends. > > > > --brian > > > > > > Howard May wrote: (Tue, 02 Sep 2008 > 10:59:07) > > > Hi Brian, > > > > > > Thanks for your response but I'm still unclear whether when the AS > > > becomes active M3UA should immediately consider the route to the > SG/STP > > > as available or whether it should wait for a DAVA. I'm also unclear > > > whether the SG should respond to DAUD concerning the SG/STPs Point > Code > > > or not. > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > > > Howard > > > > -- > > Brian F. G. Bidulock > > [email protected] > > http://www.openss7.org/ > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran