Re: Routing Context clarification
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Valerie, In the case of a single Routing Key, the Routing Context may be included (or not) in any message. For maximum interoperability, I would say that any implementation that can discern the RC value, either through configuration or negotiation, should include it in every sent message in which RC can occur, yet require it in no received message in which RC is conditional. --brian Valerie Gastaud wrote: (Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:30:36) > > Hello, > > > > I'd like to get the advice from the list on the following question: > > > > I believe it's very clear from the RFC 4666 that when multiple Routing > Keys are used across a common association, the Routing Context MUST be > sent to identify the traffic flow, assisting in the internal > distribution of Data messages. This implies that the routing context > must be sent in the ASPAC message and in the subsequent DATA messages > for this RK. > > > > However in the case where there is only one Routing Key used across an > association, it is specified that the routing context is optional and > can be negotiated between the AS and SG (sent in the ASPAC message). > > What is not clearly specified then is if the routing context MUST be > sent in the DATA message as soon as it has been sent in the ASPAC > message or if the routing context can be sent in the ASPAC message and > not in the DATA messages. > > > > What is the your advice on this point? > > > > Valerie > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/