Re: Query regarding re-registration procedure in m3ua.
"Barry Nagelberg" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Padmalochan, No, there is no need to change the ASP_ACTIVE state at the SGP after the receipt after the modification of an existing Routing Key. Barry Nagelberg Adax, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 5:18 AM To: sigtran Cc: bidulock Subject: [Sigtran] Query regarding re-registration procedure in m3ua. Hi, As per the rfc-4666, 4.4.1. Registration An ASP MAY request modification of an existing Routing Key by including a Routing Context parameter in a Registration Request message.Upon receipt of a Registration Request message containing a Routing Context, if the SGP determines that the Routing Context applies to an existing Routing Key, the SGP MAY adjust the existing Routing Key to match the new information provided in the Routing Key parameter. A Registration Response "ERR Routing Key Change Refused" is returned if the SGP does not support this re-registration procedure or RC does not exist. Otherwise, a Registration Response "Successfully Registered" is returned. I have doubt regarding the state chage after re-registration procedure. Supposed the curent state is ASP_ACTIVE, should after receive the state of the ASP chage to ASP INACTIVE? should ASP start the active procedure again? Br, Padmalochan