Re: SCTP Abort
Arvind Kumar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello! Thanks for your response. If i am using some another machine, my SG with Softswitch is working fine, adler32 works fine, but on this purticular machine even crc32 does not work. I do not think it is issue at M3UA, like SG expecting reg req (I have configured static registration both the side). The problem is repeatable on this particular machine. Thanks & Regards, Arvind On 2/26/09, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote: > > Arvind, > > Your log file shows both implementations using > Adler32 checksum. The checksum was updated to > CRC32c some years ago, why is it using Adler32? > > That is: a conforming SCTP configuration might > be a better place to start... > > --brian > > Arvind Kumar wrote: (Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:09:46) > > > > > Hello Sigtran Gurus! > > I am bringing Signaling Gateway Stack with Softswitch as follows: > > Signaling Gateway ------------- Softswitch > > 192.168.103.160 > > 192.168.103.170 > > Association is established then goes down, softswitch establishes > > the association (four way handshake), it brings up the association, > > but suddenly Signaling Gateway is aborting the association by sending > > SCTP ABORT. This is happening again and again. > > Surprising thing is that there is no reason in ABORT msg. > > Could you please give me any clue regarding this. > > I have attached the log. > > Thanks & Regards, > > Arvind > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sigtran mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > > > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ > _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran