Re: Query regarding re-registration procedure in m3ua.
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
moharana_p, It would be better if you read the specification. See RFC 4666/4.4.1 Registration: ... An ASP MAY request modification of an existing Routing Key by including a Routing Context parameter in a Registration Request message. Upon receipt of a Registration Request message containing a Routing Context, if the SGP determines that the Routing Context applies to an existing Routing Key, the SGP MAY adjust the existing Routing Key to match the new information provided in the Routing Key parameter. A Registration Response "ERR Routing Key Change Refused" is returned if the SGP does not support this re-registration procedure or RC does not exist. Otherwise, a Registration Response "Successfully Registered" is returned. ... --brian [email protected] wrote: (Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:47:28) > > Hi All, > > > I have some doubt regarding the RC parameter value in the REG REQ > message. > > > 1. As per the RFC4666 the RC is an optional parameter in the REG REQ > message. Should REG REQ message contain RC parameter during > registering a RK first time or RC parameter is only needed during > re registration procedure? > 2. In which scenario re registration of RK is required? > > > Br, > Padmalochan -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/