Re: query on SUA RFC 3868 : Sequence Control

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
JEYASEELAN,

See the thread: SUA v16: sequence control parameter in CLDT msg
from Feb 5, 2004 on the sigtran mailing list archive.

--brian

JEYASEELAN Samuel Durairaj wrote:        (Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:51:04)
> 
>    Sequence Control is not a valid parameter to protocol class '0' as per
>    the Q.711, section 6.2.2.2.2.
>    But RFC makes this as mandatory parameter for protocol class '0'.
>    Does anyone have a reason why this is a mandatory param in RFC?
>    Thanks & Regards
>    Samuel
>    -----Original Message-----
>    From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [[1]mailto:[email protected]]
>    Sent: Mon 3/23/2009 7:18 AM
>    To: JEYASEELAN Samuel Durairaj
>    Cc: [email protected]
>    Subject: Re: [Sigtran] query on SUA RFC 3868 : Sequence Control
>    JEYASEELAN,
>    RFC 3868 Section 3.10.22 Sequence Control:
>    3.10.22.  Sequence Control
>        0                   1                   2                   3
>        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>       |         Tag = 0x0116          |             Length = 8        |
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>       |                        Sequence  Control         |
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>       Sequence Control (6.2.2.2.2/Q.711)
>       The field is coded with the value of the sequence control parameter
>       associated with a group of messages and are chosen so as to ensure
>       proper loadsharing of message groups over SLS values while ensuring
>       that sequence control values within message groups have the
>    sequence
>       control value coded with the same value as the initial message of
>    the
>       message group.
>    So, pick a value that ensures proper loadsharing over SLS for your
>    protocol class 0 messages.
>    --brian
>    JEYASEELAN Samuel Durairaj
>    wrote:                                               (Sat, 21 Mar 2009
>    16:02:10)
>    >
>    >    Hi,
>    >    The CLDT msg mentions the parameter 'Sequence Control' as a
>    mandatory
>    >    in the rfc, but as per the Q.711, section 6.2.2.2.2 it is an
>    optional
>    >    parameter for the protocol class 0.
>    >    So the qtn is, what shall be the value to be stored in the
>    sequence
>    >    control while sending the CLDT to ASP?
>    >    Thanks & Regards
>    >    Samuel
>    > _______________________________________________
>    > Sigtran mailing list
>    > [email protected]
>    > [2]https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>    --
>    Brian F. G. Bidulock
>    [email protected]
>    [3]http://www.openss7.org/
> 
> References
> 
>    1. mailto:[email protected]
>    2. https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>    3. http://www.openss7.org/

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.