Re: FW: Address Indicator - SUA rfc 3868
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
JEYASEELAN, I think that the first two paragraphs of section 3.10.2.2 are quite clear on the use of bit 2. --brian JEYASEELAN Samuel Durairaj wrote: (Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:24:14) > > Brian, > I had sent the prev mail after reading the section 3.10.2.2. > PC and SSN in the cdpa/cgpa is based on the SPC_indicator and > SSN_indicator. > > But the rfc says "Do not include PC, regardless of the routing > indicator value", > what is reason to say "regardless of the routing indicator value"? > when would the ASP build the CLDT message with AI "Do not include PC, > regardless of the routing indicator value" ? and Is there any reason > for that ? > > but > > Thanks & Regards > Samuel -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/