Re: [M3UA] Double Exchange procedures
"David Laight" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > How to know whether the peer IPSP/ASP is working as per > > Single Exchange or Double exchange ? > > Is it purely based on config only ? > > Configuration only. A useful policy might be to assume SE mode > (as recommended in the RFC) with an option to configure DE mode > if you really see a need to support DE mode at all. I guess the only reason for DE is that it is symmetric. With SE one end has to do the client M3UA procedures and the other the server ones. I couldn't decide when a DE system would be able to send data, nor things like which routing context be included, so only implemented SE. David Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales) P Please consider the environment and don't print this e-mail unless you really need to