Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michael, I believe I was correcting your statement. --brian Michael Tüxen wrote: (Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:43:33) > Hi Brian, > > sorry, I do not understand what you want to say... > > Best regards > Michael > > On Jul 7, 2009, at 8:02 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > > >Michael, > > > >Err, the MTU SCTP uses when bundling is the Association Path MTU. It > >subtracts IP header and SCTP header sizes from this Path MTU only when > >considering how many chunks can be bundled. > > > >--brian > > > >Michael Tüxen wrote: (Tue, 07 Jul 2009 > >18:51:09) > >>On Jul 7, 2009, at 8:50 AM, <[email protected]> > >><[email protected] > wrote: > >> > >>>Dear all, > >>> > >>>Just to add with the SCTP bundling feature. If the "SCTP MTU" is > >>>1500, and the system is bundling messages at the SCTP level, you > >>>should have the risk to segment at the IP level (because of the IP > >>>header). So it is not efficient > >>The MTU SCTP uses is the link layer MTU minus the headers for IP and > >>SCTP. > >>I have not seen an implementation which bundles at the SCTP layer and > >>than > >>needs to fragment at the IP layer. I would consider this broken... > >>>to bundle sctp messages and to segment them at the IP level. Some > >>>vendors limits "SCTP MTU" to avoid that. This is only the Maximum > >>>transmission unit. If one SCTP message to transmit is greater, they > >>>will segment it. > >>> > > > >-- > >Brian F. G. Bidulock > >[email protected] > >http://www.openss7.org/ > > > -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/