Re: Abort chunk bundled with data chunk
Ashwani Kathuria <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
No, SACK should not be sent in such case. On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Salil Agrawal <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ashwani, > > The question is not that whether DATA chunk should be bundled with the > ABORT or not. RFC is very clear about it that the sender should not do > in that way but here the question is if we at the receiver end receives > the same then what should be the action at the receiver end (should we > send the SACK for the DATA or not). > > Thanks, > Salil > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ashwani Kathuria [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 2:11 PM > To: Salil Agrawal > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Abort chunk bundled with data chunk > > Placing DATA chunk before control chunk (ABORT) makes it an Invalid SCTP > packet. > > --Ashwani Kathuria > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Salil Agrawal <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Thanks Ashwani, >> >> I understand that it does not make any sense to send the SACK, and > abort >> chunk should be the placed before the DATA chunk. But the question is > if >> the ABORT chunk is placed after the DATA chunk in the received packet >> then should be send the SACK for the DATA or not. >> >> Thanks, >> Salil >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ashwani Kathuria [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 12:58 PM >> To: Salil Agrawal >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Abort chunk bundled with data chunk >> >> Hi Salil, >> >> When you are bundling anything (control chunk) with DATA chunk it >> should be placed before DATA chunks in the SCTP packets. >> Now if you bundle the ABORT chunk with DATA chunk in a single SCTP >> packet the ABORT chunk will be processed before DATA chunk and >> association will be broken down. >> So, that DATA chunk will have no significance as it's association is >> now broken by the ABORT chunk placed before it. >> >> --Ashwani Kathuria >> >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Salil Agrawal > <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We have a confusion while understanding the SCTP RFC4960 section 9.1 >> it >>> says "DATA chunks MUST NOT be bundled with ABORT" so sender must not >>> bundle the data with abort. >>> >>> But the second paragraph states that "An endpoint MUST NOT respond to >>> any received packet that contains an ABORT chunk". Which means if any >>> packet is received at the receiver end where ABORT is bundled with > the >>> DATA it should not send any response. Does it mean that for the DATA >>> chunk SACK should not be generated? Please clarify. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Salil Agrawal >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sigtran mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran >>> >> >