Re: [M3UA] IPSP DE ASP Up Procedures
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Evgenij, It was agreed to make all four ASP UP/Ack message mandatory for both SUA and M3UA in the thread "RE: M3UA also affected : [SUA issue 17] IPSP cases." from August 28, 2001. It is the passages mentioning two as optional that are incorrect (a holdover from drafts previous to August 2001). --brian Evgenij wrote: (Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:03:46) > > Thanks Igor! > The links is very useful for me. > > 2009/12/16 Igor Fedotov > > Hi, Evgenij > IMHO M3UA spec isn't clear in the issue. This was mentioned for > example at SIGTRAN PLUGTESTS in Moscow in 2007 > ( [1]http://www.etsi.eu/WebSite/document/PlugtestsHistory/2007SIGTRAN/ > SIGTRAN_2007_REPORT.pdf, day 5 report, issue 1). > I'd say, the most preferable approach would be to use four messages in > Double Exchange, as described here: > [2]http://www.archivum.info/[email protected]/2005-07/00030/RE:_%5BSigt > ran%5D_M3UA_:_2_or_4_messages_for_ASP-UP_in_IPSP_DE > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [3][email protected] > [4]https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > > References > > 1. http://www.etsi.eu/WebSite/document/PlugtestsHistory/2007SIGTRAN/SIGTRAN_2007_REPORT.pdf > 2. http://www.archivum.info/[email protected]/2005-07/00030/RE:_%5BSigtran%5D_M3UA_:_2_or_4_messages_for_ASP-UP_in_IPSP_DE > 3. mailto:[email protected] > 4. https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/