Re: M3UA Notification and Routing Context

Brian,


Than I guess RFC should clearly state this, rather than saying it just
"optional". Can we treat this as a update in M3UA RFC.


Thanks
aamir



-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 1:38 AM
To: Khan, Amir [NETPWR/INDIA/HYDE]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M3UA Notification and Routing Context

Amir,

RC should likely be marked "conditional" instead of "optional".

--brian

[email protected] wrote:              (Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:42:20)
> 
>    Hi All,
> 
> 
> 
>    Does it become mandatory for SG to send Notify message ("Alternate
ASP
>    Active") with Routing Context, when the concerned ASP is a part of
>    multiple AS. So that the concerned ASP can use this RC to become
>    INACTIVE for the related AS.
> 
> 
> 
>    E.g. If  ASP1 is Actively processing traffic for both AS1(Override)
>    and AS2(Loadshare) and another ASP2 of AS1 becomes ACTIVE, Do SG
then
>    needs to send Notify message ("Alternate ASP Active") with AS1
Routing
>    Context, which ASP1 will use to become INACTIVE for AS1.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    Please comment.
> 
> 
> 
>    Thanks
> 
>    aamir

> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran


--
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/