Re : Query regarding reachability STATUS of Signaling Point Code
Xiangsong Cui <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Now, a DAVA message (for SS7 point code 101) is sent by SGP to ASP > with routing context X (which is the routing context corresponding > to AS1) But why does the SGW send NAVA only for routing context X? Xiangsong ----- 原邮件 ----- 发件人: Rajesh Makhija <[email protected]> 日期: 星期五, 三月 19日, 2010 下午6:59 主题: [Sigtran] Query regarding reachability STATUS of Signaling Point Code 收件人: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 抄送: Rajat2 Gupta <[email protected]>, Amit Jain <[email protected]> > Hello, > > > > We would like to understand how the STATUS of Signaling Point Code > (that uniquely identifies an SS7 node) shall be interpreted by > M3UA at ASP/AS side. > > Entities Configured: > > Let us consider an ASP is serving two Application servers, say AS- > 1 and AS-2. This ASP is connected (through SCTP association) to > an SGP. This SGP is serving an SG. > > The routing context of AS1 is X and routing context of AS2 is Y. > > > > A route is configured for an SS7 destination (say with point code > 101) through this SG. > > This SS7 node with point code 101 is initially unavailable. > > Now, a DAVA message (for SS7 point code 101) is sent by SGP to ASP > with routing context X (which is the routing context corresponding > to AS1) > > There seem to be two possible interpretations: > > 1. SS7 node with point code (101) is marked as reachable for > both the Application servers, AS1 and AS2. > 2. SS7 point code (101) is marked as reachable for AS-1 only > (as determined by the RC in the DUNA message) and remains > unreachable for AS-2. > > Which one of the above-mentioned interpretations is correct? > > Regards > > Rajesh > > > > > ________________________________ > "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is > addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information > and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than > for what it is intended. If you have received this message in > error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are not > the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly > prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the > contents of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for > loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted > by this email including damage from virus." > _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
c00111037.vcf
(text/x-vcard, 108 B)
begin:vcard n:Cui;Xiangsong fn:Xiangsong Cui version:2.1 email;internet:[email protected] end:vcard