Re : Query regarding reachability STATUS of Signaling Point Code

Xiangsong Cui <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> Now, a DAVA message (for SS7 point code 101) is sent by SGP to ASP 
> with routing context X (which is the routing context corresponding 
> to AS1)

But why does the SGW send NAVA only for routing context X?

Xiangsong

----- 原邮件 -----
发件人: Rajesh Makhija <[email protected]>
日期: 星期五, 三月 19日, 2010 下午6:59
主题: [Sigtran] Query regarding reachability STATUS of Signaling Point	Code
收件人: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
抄送: Rajat2 Gupta <[email protected]>, Amit Jain <[email protected]>

> Hello,
> 
> 
> 
> We would like to understand how the STATUS of Signaling Point Code 
> (that uniquely identifies an SS7 node) shall be interpreted by 
> M3UA at ASP/AS side.
> 
> Entities Configured:
> 
> Let us consider an ASP is serving two Application servers, say AS-
> 1 and AS-2.  This ASP is connected (through SCTP association) to 
> an SGP. This SGP is serving an SG.
> 
> The routing context of AS1 is X and routing context of AS2 is Y.
> 
> 
> 
> A route is configured for an SS7 destination (say with point code 
> 101) through this SG.
> 
> This SS7 node with point code 101 is initially unavailable.
> 
> Now, a DAVA message (for SS7 point code 101) is sent by SGP to ASP 
> with routing context X (which is the routing context corresponding 
> to AS1)
> 
> There seem to be two possible interpretations:
> 
> 1.       SS7 node with point code (101) is marked as reachable for 
> both the Application servers, AS1 and AS2.
> 2.       SS7 point code (101) is marked as reachable for AS-1 only 
> (as determined by the RC in the DUNA message) and remains 
> unreachable for AS-2.
> 
> Which one of the above-mentioned interpretations is correct?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Rajesh
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is 
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is 
> addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information 
> and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than 
> for what it is intended. If you have received this message in 
> error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are not 
> the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly 
> prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the 
> contents of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for 
> loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted 
> by this email including damage from virus."
>

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
c00111037.vcf (text/x-vcard, 108 B)
begin:vcard
n:Cui;Xiangsong
fn:Xiangsong Cui
version:2.1
email;internet:[email protected]
end:vcard
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.