Re: optional Network Appearance field

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:12:46 -0600

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization	http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Moloud,

Think of NA + PC as a less granular RC.  NA + PC was the
preferred method of one many years ago and placing it
in the RFC was a solution to a long argument.  NA is
necessary only in the RK of the REG REQ message.

--brian

Moloud Mousavi wrote:                      (Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:09:46)
> 
>    Hi,
> 
> 
> 
>    Network appearance comes to play in ASP-SGP connection. I assume that
>    is one of the reasons that it as an optional field in messages. Right?
> 
>    I was wondering how come in some messages, there is an optional
>    Network Appearance field  (ex.  SSNM, or Data) and for some "ASPM" is
>    not considered at all.
> 
> 
>    Thanks,
> 
>    Moloud


-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/